🔑 Transactional leadership is a management style that focuses on influencing people's actions by meeting their needs through rewards and punishments.
💼 This leadership style is closely linked to Maslow's hierarchy of needs, as it reflects a give-and-take approach to keep the team on track.
💰 The assumption of transactional leadership is that better pay and conditions lead to better performance, promotion, and increased productivity.
🔑 Transactional leadership uses carrot and stick rewards and punishments to maintain performance.
📈 Above baseline performance can be rewarded, while below baseline performance is punished.
👥 Transactional leadership ensures a reasonable level of productivity, but may not inspire people beyond the minimum standard.
💼 Transactional leadership is easy to understand and implement, but it is not effective in bringing out the best in people.
💪 Monetary incentives do not necessarily improve performance, and harsh penalties discourage risk-taking.
🚫 An atmosphere of fear hinders creativity and prevents people from experimenting and taking risks.
✨ Transactional leadership is effective when a job needs to be completed without a big vision or specific team.
👥 It is suitable for well-defined problems with tried and tested solutions.
📊 Transactional leadership is also known as managerial leadership and is used in basic project, program, and production contexts.
💼 Transactional leadership is a management approach used when there is a known process to deal with issues.
🚧 It is not the preferred style of management for complex or creative problems, but it can be useful when relationships break down.
👥 Leaders should understand transactional leadership and use it as a backup tool to remain firm but fair in difficult situations.
🔑 Transactional leadership is a contingency plan, not the preferred method.
💡 Visionary, transformational, and servant leadership are more powerful than transactional leadership.
🌍 People are motivated by a higher purpose, not just monetary rewards and contracts.