馃攽 The principles of ethics in research with humans are evaluated by an ethics committee.
馃挕 The social value and scientific methodological value of the proposed research are crucial.
鈿栵笍 Balancing risks and benefits is an important aspect of ethical research.
馃攳 When evaluating the risk-benefit in an ethics committee, there are two types of techniques: invasive and non-invasive.
馃拤 Injections can be considered invasive techniques, but the level of risk varies depending on factors such as the location and size of the injection.
鈿栵笍 Risk assessment in research involves comparing the minimum risk with the potential complications that can occur.
馃М The determination of minimum risk is subjective and can be compared to the daily life of an individual, which varies from person to person.
馃搲 In the case of healthy volunteers, the accepted risk level is higher compared to individuals with health issues.
馃攳 The importance of weighing the benefits and risks in research involving humans.
鈿栵笍 Ethical considerations in evaluating the risk-benefit balance.
馃敀 Protecting the privacy and dignity of research participants.
馃攳 Participants in human research must be informed of the risks and give consent.
馃挵 If harm occurs, compensation should be provided.
鈿栵笍 We cannot take any risks without the consent of the participant.
馃摎 The use of placebos in biomedical research.
鈿狅笍 The importance of protecting research subjects.
馃實 International declarations regarding risks.
馃拪 The use of control groups in research.
馃攽 The use of a placebo is important in research studies to compare the effectiveness of a new treatment.
馃敩 Ethical considerations in clinical research include the concept of 'therapeutic uncertainty' and the need for a proper control group.
鈿栵笍 Designing an experiment requires a clear scientific value and consideration of potential issues.
馃攳 The video discusses the historic framework of ethics in human research.
馃拪 The first clinical trials and retroviral medications were introduced.
鈿栵笍 The importance of balancing risk assessment and subjective judgment in research participation is highlighted.