Supreme Court Trial on the Ending of Decisive Vote at CARF
The Supreme Court analyzes actions questioning the end of decisive vote at CARF, giving taxpayers an advantage in tax disputes.
00:00:00 The Supreme Court began analyzing actions that question the end of the decisive vote in the Administrative Council for Tax Appeals (CARF). The change gives taxpayers an advantage in tax disputes.
📺 The Supreme Court is currently reviewing actions that challenge the removal of the casting vote in the CARF.
🗳️ The casting vote, previously held by the president of the judging panel and representing the Federal Revenue, has been modified.
💼 The outcome of tax credit disputes will now be resolved in favor of the taxpayer, rather than the government.
00:01:03 The STF begins the trial on actions questioning the end of majority vote at CARF. Three parties present their arguments, highlighting flaws in the legislative process and imbalance in judgment quality.
🔍 The Supreme Court of Brazil is reviewing cases related to the elimination of the majority vote in CARF.
⚖️ There are three main arguments presented: procedural defects, imbalance in quality of judgments, and bias towards private interests.
📝 The relator, Minister Marco Aurélio, argues that the change in the rule was unconstitutional and a violation of democratic principles.
00:02:09 STF begins trial on actions challenging the end of quality vote at CARF. The analysis of the case in the virtual plenary is expected to be concluded on April 12.
✅ The Supreme Court is considering the elimination of the voto de qualidade in the CARF.
⚖️ The Dean of the Supreme Court believes that the tiebreaker by not paying the taxes is legitimate and reasonable.
🗓️ The virtual plenary session to analyze the case is scheduled to end on April 12th.
Want to deep dive into this video?
