π GPT-4 is generally considered better than ChatGPT 3.5, but there are some use cases where ChatGPT 3.5 performs better.
π The speaker conducted his own experiments to find these use cases, testing prompts in both GPT-3.5 and GPT-4.
π» The speaker offers an ebook and a Prompt Engineering Course for those who want to learn more about creating effective prompts.
π GPT-4 has higher guardrails and is more limited in its freedom of thought compared to GPT 3.5.
πΌ ChatGPT 3.5 can simulate job interviews and provide scripts for conversation scenarios.
π§ GPT-4 performs better in generating creative answers, but is less human-like in interview scenarios.
π€ GPT-4 is more rigid and less human compared to GPT 3.5
π₯ GPT-4's responses are less human and more fact-based
π‘ GPT-4 has higher guardrails and generates rigidly by default
π£οΈ GPT-3.5 has more concise responses compared to GPT-4
π GPT-4 performs better in job interview simulations
π GPT-4 is better at asking questions and engaging in interaction.
π‘ GPT 3.5 is excellent at uncovering unique and interesting information on any given topic.
πΊ Both GPT-4 and GPT 3.5 provide fascinating facts about beer, such as spontaneous fermentation and ancient Chinese beer recipes.
πΊ ChatGPT 3.5 provides a more engaging and interesting response with information about the history and process of beer brewing.
π GPT-4 offers a heavily detailed answer, which may not be suitable for topics that require less specific information.
π‘ The comparison between ChatGPT 3.5 and GPT-4 highlights the importance of considering the desired level of detail and engagement when generating responses.
π GPT-4 uses more specific prompts that imply misunderstood or overlooked aspects.
πΊ Yeast plays a crucial role in flavor profiles and the brewing process.
π‘ Understanding yeast in beer helps appreciate its diversity and enables brewers to achieve specific flavors and aromas.
π GPT 3.5 provides more unconstrained results compared to GPT-4.
πΊ GPT 3.5 generates practical knowledge about beer serving temperature and glassware.
π‘ GPT 4 performs well in generating opinions on important qualities in different contexts.
π GPT 3.5 emphasizes the importance of adaptability for leaders in startups.
π‘ GPT 4 also acknowledges the significance of adaptability in running a startup but with a less confident tone.
π± Both versions highlight the need for leaders to navigate the ever-changing business landscape and embrace opportunities for growth.
π The most essential quality for a leader is adaptability.
π‘ GPT-3.5 is preferable over GPT-4 when asking for a general opinion.
π Crafting specific prompts requires more customization beyond copy-pasting.
π― Prompt engineering is the key to achieving specific results and saving time with language models like ChatGPT 3.5 and GPT-4.
π‘ A brand new course has been developed to teach prompt engineering from basics to advanced techniques, offering valuable insights and strategies.
β οΈ The video focuses on intermediate to advanced users who want to enhance their prompt engineering skills.