Examining the Participation of Third Parties in Defendant's Statements
The video discusses whether a third party can participate in the defendant's statement during the preliminary investigation and calls for equal defense rights for third party civil defendants.
00:00:01 A lawyer argues that the prosecutor's interpretation of a legal provision is incorrect, preventing them from participating in a defendant's statement as a third civil party.
The video discusses the restriction of the participation of third parties in the statement of the accused.
The speaker argues that as a third party involved in the case, they have the right to participate in all proceedings and interrogate the accused.
The interpretation of the law regarding the presence of third parties during the statement is analyzed, highlighting the importance of protecting the rights of the accused.
00:13:27 LP discusses the ability of a third party to participate in the defendant's statement during the preliminary investigation and calls for equal defense rights for third party civil defendants.
📚 The video discusses the role of the third party in the investigation and declaration of the accused.
⚖️ The speaker argues that the third party should be allowed to participate in the investigation and have the same defense possibilities as the prosecution.
⛔ The speaker criticizes the restriction of rights and calls for equal treatment and respect for the rights of all parties involved.
00:26:51 The video discusses whether a third party can participate in the statement of an accused person. The speaker argues that the law only applies to the accused and co-accused, not the third party.
⚖️ The video discusses the prohibition of a third party's participation in the defendant's statement during a legal proceeding.
🔒 The video emphasizes that there is no extension of rights to a third party based on the principle that fundamental rights cannot be restricted by reference alone.
🧑⚖️ The video highlights the importance of understanding the purpose and interpretation of the law before becoming automatons in the judicial process.
00:40:18 Discussion on whether the prohibition for the defense of an accused to participate in the statement of their co-accused extends to the civil third party. The speaker argues that the reasons for the prohibition, such as psychological pressure and contradictory positions, could also apply to the civil third party. They emphasize the need for a fair and balanced process and argue against applying criminal rules to civil proceedings.
📌 The video discusses the prohibition of the defense of an accused from participating in the statement of their co-accused.
💡 The reasons for this prohibition include avoiding psychological pressure and contradictory positions between the accused and co-accused.
🔎 The interpretation of this norm in relation to the third party civilly responsible is also discussed.
00:53:45 LP discusses whether a third party should be prohibited from participating in the statement of the defendant. The discussion revolves around the implications for both civil and criminal matters and the interpretation of legal provisions.
The video discusses the prohibition of third parties from participating in the declaration of the accused in criminal proceedings.
There is a debate on whether the prohibition should apply to civil third parties as well.
The speaker argues that restrictions on rights and provisions must be clearly stated and not open to interpretation.
01:07:10 The video discusses whether a third party can participate in the testimony of the accused. It analyzes the legal aspects and concludes that the third party can indeed participate.
📜 The third party responsible can apply the same rights as the defendant in the criminal proceedings, including participating in all the proceedings.
⚖️ The prohibition mentioned in the penal procedural code does not apply to the participation of the third party's defense in the defendant's statement.
💼 The prosecution argues that the defense of the third party responsible cannot participate in the defendant's statement.
01:20:37 A discussion on whether a third party can participate in the statement of the accused. The defense argues for the right, but it is denied based on legal reasons and the need for fairness.
🔑 The defense of a third party in a criminal process has the same rights and guarantees as the accused.
🔐 The prohibition for the defense of the accused to participate in their co-accused's statement is to ensure a natural environment for the accused and to avoid pressure or contradictory positions.
⚖️ The defense of a third party responsible also falls under the same prohibition as the defense of the accused.
Want to deep dive into this video?
