Choosing the Best Monitor for Mac: 32” 4K vs 32” 1440p
Comparing the 32” 4K and 32” 1440p monitors for Mac: resolution, scaling, and pixel density discussed. 4K offers sharper images, better for programming, while 1440p is a budget-friendly option.
00:00:00 Comparing the 32” 4K and 32” 1440p monitors for Mac. The resolution and scaling factor are discussed, highlighting the importance of pixels per inch in Retina and non-Retina displays.
📺 The video compares the LG 32-inch 4K monitor and the LG 32-inch 1440p monitor for Mac users.
🔍 Mac OS uses a 2X scaling factor, so even a 27-inch 5K display will run at 1440p to maintain a readable size.
🔍👀 Pixel per inch (PPI) is an important factor for retina and non-retina displays.
00:01:06 Comparing 32" 4K and 32" 1440p monitors for Mac. Text and interface elements may appear too small or too big due to pixel density. Recommended PPI not met, but 27" 1440p and 34" 1440p Ultrawide are good options.
⚖️ The recommended pixel density for displays is around 110-220 pixels per inch, and using displays that deviate from this range can result in either small or large text and interface elements.
🖥️ The 32-inch 4K monitor has a pixel density of 140 pixels per inch, while the 32-inch 1440p monitor has a pixel density of 93 pixels per inch. Neither of these monitors are close to the recommended pixel density, but other options like a 27-inch 1440p monitor or a 34-inch 1440p ultra-wide monitor can be suitable for non-retina displays on a Mac.
💻 The comparison between 32” 4K and 32” 1440p monitors depends on the desired screen resolution and the user's preference.
00:02:10 Comparing 32” 4K and 32” 1440p monitors for Mac: 1080p offers sharpness with no performance issues, while 1440p may have performance issues. Running 1440p on a 4K monitor scales to 5K and then down to 1440p.
⚖️ Choosing between a 32" 4K monitor and a 32" 1440p monitor for Mac requires considering image sharpness and performance.
⚙️ Using the 2x gain factor on the Mac and setting the resolution to 1080p provides the sharpest image without performance issues.
🖥️ Running the 4K monitor at 1440p requires scaling the resolution to 5K and then downscaling to 1440p, leading to potential performance issues.
00:03:15 A comparison between 32" 4K and 32" 1440p monitors for Mac. The 4K monitor offers sharper images and easier reading, making it ideal for programming and reading articles. Performance depends on GPU and work type.
The 4K monitor running at 1440p is significantly sharper than the 1440p monitor.
For programmers, students, and those who engage in reading and writing, the 4K monitor is recommended due to its sharpness and readability.
The performance of the monitors was not affected by the resolution difference, and it depends on the computer's GPU and the type of work being done.
00:04:16 Comparing the performance and image quality of 32” 4K and 32” 1440p monitors for Mac. 4K offers better image quality but loses screen real estate compared to 1440p.
Running a 4K monitor at 1080p on a Mac provides the best image quality and performance.
However, using a 1440p monitor offers more screen real estate compared to 4K.
Examples will be provided to demonstrate the difference in screen real estate.
00:05:52 Discover the best monitor for your Mac between 32" 4K and 32" 1440p. The 4K monitor offers sharper image and more resolution options, while the 1440p monitor is a great budget-friendly alternative.
🖥️ The 4K monitor offers a versatile user interface with multiple resolution options, including 1080P, 4040p, and 1692p.
💰 The 1440p monitor is a budget-friendly option and still provides a great user experience.
📺 The 4K monitor is recommended for those who prioritize image sharpness and want more resolution choices.
Want to deep dive into this video?
