Translation Capabilities Showdown: ChatGPT vs. Google Bard vs. DeepL
Comparing translation capabilities of ChatGPT, Google Bard, and DeepL. DeepL impressed with complex sentences, while others struggled. DeepL performed the best, followed by Google Bard, and ChatGPT falls behind.
00:00:00 Comparing the translation capabilities of ChatGPT, Google Bard, and DeepL, focusing on machine translation. Is generative AI really taking over? Testing with a text from the Swiss National Museum.
🔑 ChatGPT, Google Bard, and DeepL are generative AI language models used for machine translation.
🌍 DeepL, a machine translation tool, is considered more advanced than generative AI for translation.
⚖️ The video aims to compare the translation capabilities of ChatGPT, Google Bard, and DeepL.
00:02:34 A comparison of the translation quality between ChatGPT, Google Bard, and DeepL. The video analyzes the strengths and weaknesses of AI and machine translation using a short text in German.
🔑 The transcription discusses the comparison of different AI translation models, including ChatGPT, Google Bard, and DeepL.
💪 The speaker expresses dissatisfaction with the current translation on a museum's website and suggests offering revising services.
🔍 The speaker examines the translations of the text using ChatGPT, Google Bard, and DeepL, comparing them to the original German text.
00:05:09 A comparison of translation accuracy between ChatGPT, Google Bard, and DeepL AI. Differences in case usage and contextual nuances were observed.
Different AI translation models struggled with translating a difficult sentence accurately.
ChatGPT used the wrong case in a sentence while Bard and DeepL got it right.
The AI models mistranslated the word 'workshop' as 'Werkstatt' instead of 'Atelier'.
00:07:49 Comparing the translation quality of CHATGPT, GOOGLE BARD, and DEEPL. None of them translated one word well in German. However, DeepL did a fantastic job in preserving and maintaining extensive collections. DeepL also kept the focus on guests, unlike the others. Overall, none of the AI models translated perfectly.
🤔 Google Bard, DeepL, and ChatGPT were compared for their translation abilities.
👍 DeepL provided the most accurate and natural translations.
😕 Google Bard and ChatGPT had some shortcomings in their translations.
🌐 The video discussed specific examples of translation differences among the AI systems.
00:10:26 Comparison between ChatGPT, Google Bard, and DeepL for translation accuracy in an art context. Each AI model had strengths and weaknesses, but human editing is still crucial for a polished result.
🤔 Different AI translation models (ChatGPT, Google BARD, DeepL) were compared.
📚 Translations of art-related terms varied across the models.
⏰ Post-editing may be required to improve the translated text.
00:13:03 'Ein neuer Stil der Zusammenarbeit, der über die Grenzen der getrennten Abteilungen und verschiedenen Einrichtungen hinausgeht, wurde eingeführt'. DeepL impressed by decoding complex sentences, while ChatGPT and Google Bard struggled. Overall, DeepL performed better.
🔑 Google Bard translates the sentence 'Hat begonnen' as 'It just started' which is a more neutral and accurate translation compared to the others.
😮 DeepL performs exceptionally well in translating a complex sentence involving the reorganization of workflows and achieving a new level of professionalism.
❌ DeepL fails to properly translate a challenging sentence that involves multiple steps and puts them too close together.
00:15:40 A comparison of translation capabilities between CHATGPT, GOOGLE BARD, and DEEPL reveals that DEEPL performs the best, followed by GOOGLE BARD, while CHATGPT falls behind.
🥇 DeepL performed the best in terms of translation.
🥈 Google Bard came in second place and impressed with a few well-translated sentences.
🥉 ChatGPT lagged behind DeepL and Google Bard in translation.
Want to deep dive into this video?
