📚 GPT-4 is generally considered better than ChatGPT 3.5, but there are some use cases where ChatGPT 3.5 performs better.
🔍 The speaker conducted his own experiments to find these use cases, testing prompts in both GPT-3.5 and GPT-4.
💻 The speaker offers an ebook and a Prompt Engineering Course for those who want to learn more about creating effective prompts.
📋 GPT-4 has higher guardrails and is more limited in its freedom of thought compared to GPT 3.5.
💼 ChatGPT 3.5 can simulate job interviews and provide scripts for conversation scenarios.
🧠 GPT-4 performs better in generating creative answers, but is less human-like in interview scenarios.
🤖 GPT-4 is more rigid and less human compared to GPT 3.5
👥 GPT-4's responses are less human and more fact-based
💡 GPT-4 has higher guardrails and generates rigidly by default
🗣️ GPT-3.5 has more concise responses compared to GPT-4
📝 GPT-4 performs better in job interview simulations
📚 GPT-4 is better at asking questions and engaging in interaction.
💡 GPT 3.5 is excellent at uncovering unique and interesting information on any given topic.
🍺 Both GPT-4 and GPT 3.5 provide fascinating facts about beer, such as spontaneous fermentation and ancient Chinese beer recipes.
🍺 ChatGPT 3.5 provides a more engaging and interesting response with information about the history and process of beer brewing.
📚 GPT-4 offers a heavily detailed answer, which may not be suitable for topics that require less specific information.
💡 The comparison between ChatGPT 3.5 and GPT-4 highlights the importance of considering the desired level of detail and engagement when generating responses.
📝 GPT-4 uses more specific prompts that imply misunderstood or overlooked aspects.
🍺 Yeast plays a crucial role in flavor profiles and the brewing process.
💡 Understanding yeast in beer helps appreciate its diversity and enables brewers to achieve specific flavors and aromas.
📊 GPT 3.5 provides more unconstrained results compared to GPT-4.
🍺 GPT 3.5 generates practical knowledge about beer serving temperature and glassware.
💡 GPT 4 performs well in generating opinions on important qualities in different contexts.
🔑 GPT 3.5 emphasizes the importance of adaptability for leaders in startups.
💡 GPT 4 also acknowledges the significance of adaptability in running a startup but with a less confident tone.
🌱 Both versions highlight the need for leaders to navigate the ever-changing business landscape and embrace opportunities for growth.
🔑 The most essential quality for a leader is adaptability.
💡 GPT-3.5 is preferable over GPT-4 when asking for a general opinion.
🌐 Crafting specific prompts requires more customization beyond copy-pasting.
🎯 Prompt engineering is the key to achieving specific results and saving time with language models like ChatGPT 3.5 and GPT-4.
💡 A brand new course has been developed to teach prompt engineering from basics to advanced techniques, offering valuable insights and strategies.
⚠️ The video focuses on intermediate to advanced users who want to enhance their prompt engineering skills.
Entrevista al Exdiputado Domínguez | De Frente | Domingo 1 de octubre de 2023
Different Phases of Compiler
How I Schedule With Neuroscience: Trick Your Brain to Work
Introduction to Compiler Design
Jo Boaler: How to Learn Math | Lex Fridman Podcast #226
What Alcohol Does to Your Body, Brain & Health | Huberman Lab Podcast #86