ā½ļø Google Bard provides quick responses with no visible writing progress, allowing users to continue with a Google search.
ā³ ChatSonic takes time to search, but rewards users with multiple sources once a result is found.
š¤ ChatGPT and Perplexity AI also have their own strengths and weaknesses, and users need to evaluate which one suits their needs.
š Perplexity AI provides fast and accurate search results with visualized progress, sources, and pictures.
š ChatGPT requires an extra prompt for internet search, but with GPT4 enabled, it yields good results with visualized progress, sources, and pictures.
ā Bard is fast and accurate, while ChatSonic is slightly slower but still shows sources.
š¢ Bard is fast but lacks creativity, requires more human input.
š” ChatSonic is fast and comprehensive, needs minor adjustments for real world use.
š¤ Perplexity is fast but lacks creativity, suitable for short and precise texts.
š ChatGPT excels at creating perfect emails and follows a good structure.
š” Chat GPT adds creativity to the text and delivers a lengthy outcome.
š Chat Sonic is the winner as it provides perfectly usable and appropriately sized results.
š§ Bard lacks creativity and fails to create a strong sales email.
š¤ Chat Sonic is not usable as it took a long time to provide an answer.
š Perplexity AI provides a short answer with nicely visualized selling points.
š„ Chat GPT excels in the task with a great subject, incredible creativity, and unique product naming.
š The transcript compares the selling features of different AI models.
š” Chat GPT and Chat Sonic are recommended for high-quality writing.
š Perplexity is the winner for web-based research.