The Power of a Major Shareholder: Can They Control Bitcoin?
A discussion on the potential influence of a major shareholder on Bitcoin and the misconception that they can change its consensus mechanism. Unlikely due to legal limitations, but raises questions about motives and impact on value.
00:00:00 A discussion on BlackRock's potential influence on Bitcoin as the majority shareholder of major mining companies, considering their expertise in directing businesses. Their focus on the ESG narrative is also explored.
🔑 BlackRock's ownership of major Bitcoin mining companies allows them to have control over their operations.
đź’Ľ BlackRock's influence on corporations through the ESG narrative may impact Bitcoin's future.
đź’ Engaging in thought experiments and discussions about BlackRock's involvement in Bitcoin is crucial.
00:01:02 The video discusses the misconception that BlackRock can force a change in Bitcoin's consensus mechanism from proof of work to proof of stake. It highlights that miners do not have the authority to make that decision and explains the difference between miners and developers.
🔎 The battle between proof of work and proof of stake is discussed, with Ethereum transitioning to proof of stake.
⛏️ There is a misconception that BlackRock can force Bitcoin miners to switch to proof of stake, but miners are not responsible for coding the necessary software.
đź’ˇ The idea of a mining operation controlling the direction of Bitcoin's consensus mechanism is unlikely and not aligned with the decentralized nature of the cryptocurrency.
00:02:08 Can BlackRock control Bitcoin's future? Unlikely. Voluntarily ending their own business doesn't make sense. Controlling mining operations doesn't give them power to change the blockchain.
BlackRock's control over mining operations does not give them power to move to proof of stake.
History of Ethereum and miners' resistance to proof of stake.
BlackRock's potential difficulty in getting sign off on moving to proof of stake.
00:03:10 Can BlackRock have control over Bitcoin? Unlikely due to legal limitations and limited applicability to US citizens.
🔑 BlackRock cannot force people to use a new version of Bitcoin or any currency unless it is declared legal tender.
đź’Ľ BlackRock's ability to force the use of Bitcoin would only apply to US citizens.
âť— The main issue is that BlackRock lacks the power to enforce the use of Bitcoin.
00:04:14 BlackRock's potential control over Bitcoin raises questions about their motives and the impact on the asset's value. Despite BlackRock's interest, the market dominance of Bitcoin remains strong.
đź’° BlackRock's potential investment in Bitcoin raises questions about their motivation and the impact on its value.
🔥 Bitcoin's market dominance and the challenges faced by other versions of the cryptocurrency.
🤔 The possibility of BlackRock prioritizing power over money in their pursuit of Bitcoin ownership.
00:05:19 Find out if BlackRock can control Bitcoin and how to avoid a doomsday scenario in the cryptocurrency space. Join the conversation and vote with your investments.
đź’ˇ BlackRock owns a majority of the S&P 500 and seeks to control what they own.
âť“ What are the risks and holes in the argument about BlackRock's potential takeover of Bitcoin?
🗣️ The cryptocurrency space is still developing and end users can influence it through their investments.
Want to deep dive into this video?You might also like...
Read more on Education
Great Cathedral Mystery - PBS Nova - Documentary
Brazil - Interdependence via Migrant Flows (A-Level Geography)
Disney•Pixar’s Coco presents “Dante’s Lunch - A Short Tail”
Presente de pueblos indĂgenas en Chile. 4° medio. Historia y GeografĂa.
ACLS Original Part 1
Customer Satisfaction: Metrics That Matter + How to Improve Them
