β½οΈ Google Bard provides quick responses with no visible writing progress, allowing users to continue with a Google search.
β³ ChatSonic takes time to search, but rewards users with multiple sources once a result is found.
π€ ChatGPT and Perplexity AI also have their own strengths and weaknesses, and users need to evaluate which one suits their needs.
π Perplexity AI provides fast and accurate search results with visualized progress, sources, and pictures.
π ChatGPT requires an extra prompt for internet search, but with GPT4 enabled, it yields good results with visualized progress, sources, and pictures.
β Bard is fast and accurate, while ChatSonic is slightly slower but still shows sources.
π’ Bard is fast but lacks creativity, requires more human input.
π‘ ChatSonic is fast and comprehensive, needs minor adjustments for real world use.
π€ Perplexity is fast but lacks creativity, suitable for short and precise texts.
π ChatGPT excels at creating perfect emails and follows a good structure.
π‘ Chat GPT adds creativity to the text and delivers a lengthy outcome.
π Chat Sonic is the winner as it provides perfectly usable and appropriately sized results.
π§ Bard lacks creativity and fails to create a strong sales email.
π€ Chat Sonic is not usable as it took a long time to provide an answer.
π Perplexity AI provides a short answer with nicely visualized selling points.
π₯ Chat GPT excels in the task with a great subject, incredible creativity, and unique product naming.
π The transcript compares the selling features of different AI models.
π‘ Chat GPT and Chat Sonic are recommended for high-quality writing.
π Perplexity is the winner for web-based research.