Championing the Rejection of a Mining Contract Proposal

👥 The speaker wants a rich debate on the proposed discussion and not get caught up in technicalities.

⚖️ A legislative proposal requires the approval of two-thirds of the commission or the plenary, while a resolution only requires a simple majority.

💡 The speaker emphasizes that the proposed suspension of the discussion must follow the rules and be approved by the required majority.

💡 The government initiated a dialogue with the country on various topics, including the mining contract.

🔍 The executive failed to mention certain constitutional issues in the resolution.

⛏️ There is a proposal for a mining moratorium.

🗣️ The speaker highlights the lack of communication and consideration for communities affected by mining activities.

🌍 Concerns are raised about environmental damages caused by mining and the lack of oversight in Panama.

💼 The importance of updating and regulating the mining code is emphasized over approving new mining contracts.

The speaker argues against the mining contract due to a lack of real oversight.

The current mining law prohibits foreign government involvement, but the contract involves a state-owned Korean company.

The speaker urges the rejection of the contract and questions the consistency of the president's statements.

📜 The speaker questions why the ministers of environment and commerce don't understand the need to withdraw from the mining contract.

❌ There are brave colleagues from different political parties who refuse to approve the current contract and suggest rejection.

💬 The speaker believes that the assembly should not make a recommendation, as it is the government's decision to renegotiate or withdraw the contract.

🔑 The assembly should not compromise its constitutional role.

💡 The resolution should address all necessary modifications, not just cosmetic ones.

🗣️ The participation of citizens should be considered and their voices heard.

⚖️ Juan Diego Vásquez argues against approving a mining contract due to legal concerns and the omission of important points.

🗳️ He believes the resolution will be approved with fewer votes than required, and suggests withdrawing it to honor the concerns of the commission members.

🚫 Vásquez urges rejecting the contract outright and allowing for further discussion on a more suitable agreement.